Letters to the Editor, January 6, 2014
Mengdi Lin has the story only partly correct in her article ("Birth quotas and Chinese patriarchy still a lethal combination for baby girls", January 1).

Mengdi Lin has the story only partly correct in her article ("Birth quotas and Chinese patriarchy still a lethal combination for baby girls", January 1).
Lin places the majority of the blame for sex-selective abortion of female fetuses on China's one-child policy, rather than on Chinese patriarchy, where it properly belongs.
Lin cites as evidence for her argument India, which does not have a mandatory quota on children per family.
However, many well- documented studies show that India suffers similar child sex imbalances to China, and that the sex ratio becomes more and more distorted for second-, third- and fourth-born children.
This indicates that there is a lot of sex-selective abortion going on and the likely reason for the low annual abortion number Lin cites is because sex-selective abortion is illegal in India.
The conclusion is that the abortions are taking place, they just aren't being reported. So if China's one-child policy and India's no mandatory quota produce similar birth ratios, the problem is clearly not the system. Rather, the root cause is that neither of these two ancient civilisations has developed a consciousness that values equally the life of a male and a female baby.