Letters to the Editor, May 5, 2014
I strongly recommend that the Development Bureau takes on board the reservations and criticisms given by renowned British designer Thomas Heatherwick ("Don't give up green 'theatre' for flats", April 26).

I strongly recommend that the Development Bureau takes on board the reservations and criticisms given by renowned British designer Thomas Heatherwick ("Don't give up green 'theatre' for flats", April 26).
The green belt, government, institution, or community (G/IC) sites, and public open space are all a valid part of the jigsaw that makes Hong Kong such an interesting and liveable city. However, the dominant development tycoons are so profit-orientated that they exhibit no interest in creating an interesting or optimal living environment.
The government is using short-term pragmatism to deprive the community of green belt and sites for community facilities to accommodate these vested interests ("Planners seek clarity on what green belt is for", April 26).
Instead of this near-sighted approach, which has negative implications for the future in Hong Kong, our government should follow Macau's lead and work with the mainland authorities to expand into Shenzhen and Guangzhou in order to accommodate our residential housing needs. Heatherwick is correct to point out that it is poor planning and architecture to allow redevelopment on such a large scale. It is boring and dehumanising.
It is also evidence of the laziness of bureaucrats (particularly the Urban Renewal Authority) and their collusion with major developers. It would be so much better for Hong Kong to again develop smaller sites, and this has a beneficial knock-on effect for the employment of more creative architects, engineers, surveyors and designers.
Our city needs new ideas - I am tired of seeing the same old rubbish from the developer establishment.