Letters to the Editor, May 9, 2014
The government's refusal to allow full disclosure of the Lamma ferry disaster investigation report vividly puts Hong Kong's lack of freedom of information in perspective.

The government's refusal to allow full disclosure of the Lamma ferry disaster investigation report vividly puts Hong Kong's lack of freedom of information in perspective.
The explanation by officials that publication will hamper ongoing criminal investigations as a justification sugarcoated the inconvenient truth that the grieving families simply have no legal entitlement whatsoever to be informed of the report's content.
The lack of a right-to-information regime in Hong Kong has placed its citizens in a passive position. Without a statutory duty to disclose and clear delineation of the limited circumstances where the government can legitimately refuse disclosure, citizens are forced to accept wishy-washy explanations provided by officials that are more often a bureaucratic escape route than a genuine gesture to address concerns.
The current Code on Access to Information is inadequate, as it applies only to departments listed on its appendix and does not mandate the government to archive information.
The code also enables the government to deny disclosure in a multitude of overly broad scenarios framed in general terms. As the administration can do so on grounds of its "efficient management and operation", it is no exaggeration to say that the code is a decorative tool that exists to protect primarily the government's interests.
Freedom of information is the least the Hong Kong government can offer amid its lack of representativeness and the grim future of universal suffrage. Its recognition is overdue to truly establish accountability in the government and its officials.