Letters to the Editor, June 2, 2014
Your article regarding the lengthy process in obtaining a new British passport highlights an important issue ("Passport snag angers city's Brits", May 29). The new process implemented by the British government totally neglects the fact that this process effectively denies a person the right to travel at will.

The new process implemented by the British government under the all-encompassing (and hard to argue against) excuse that this is to improve security, totally neglects the fact that this process effectively denies a person the right to travel at will.
I and my wife have sons living in Australia and New Zealand and sisters in the UK, and would expect to be able to travel within a few hours should anything untoward such as an accident or medical emergency arise. With this new system where your old passport is effectively confiscated for four to six weeks, the British government removes my right to travel.
The only way around this, which I carried out last year, is to make the application in person at the passport office in Britain. You can make an appointment three weeks in advance, but only when using a UK phone. To be fair the actual process was carried out efficiently; I left with a new passport in hand just six hours after handing in my application, lighter by over £100 (HK$1,300).
Interestingly, the small coffee shop opposite the passport office near Victoria station was full at 8.30 in the morning with people doing exactly the same as me. One gentleman I spoke to had flown in from Dubai that morning just to carry out his renewal.
Why is it that the British government has to make such a gigantic procedure out of what should be a routine, efficient, process to renew one's travel document?
