Advertisement
OpinionLetters

Letters to the Editor, July 4, 2014

I was disappointed by the groundless defence by Law Society president Ambrose Lam San-keung of Beijing's white paper on the practice of "one country, two systems" in Hong Kong.

Reading Time:5 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Not convinced by Shinzo Abe's peace pledge. Photo: Xinhua
Letters

I was disappointed by the groundless defence by Law Society president Ambrose Lam San-keung of Beijing's white paper on the practice of "one country, two systems" in Hong Kong.

The white paper stated that judges are administrators and as such have a basic political requirement to love the country.

Advertisement

Mr Lam, in defending the white paper, stretched the meaning of "administration" to include the executive branch, the legislature and the judiciary.

However, one has to look into the meaning of words in context. It is crystal clear that what Beijing wanted to express in the white paper is that judges in Hong Kong should work together with the executive branch and serve the political needs of the country. Anyone with a basic understanding of China's legal system will know that judges on the mainland decide cases by order of the ruling Communist Party, not by law.

Advertisement

The white paper is thus a blatant attempt to undermine judicial independence in Hong Kong, which is essential to the city's rule of law.

The Law Society is expected to be a custodian of the city's rule of law.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x