Letters to the Editor, July 24, 2014
Democracy of the kind achievable here in Hong Kong is not worth the heat it is generating, and the whole issue of political reform has become a distraction in my opinion.

Democracy of the kind achievable here in Hong Kong is not worth the heat it is generating, and the whole issue of political reform has become a distraction in my opinion.
What is much more important for stability and success in Hong Kong is the maintenance of the rule of law founded on an independent judiciary and independent law enforcement.
For that reason, I share the alarm that has been expressed in connection with the white paper issued by the central government last month.
The autonomy exercised up to now by Hong Kong is not founded solely on the authority of the central government, as the white paper claims. The city's autonomy is the subject of an international agreement freely entered into by the sovereign governments of China and Britain in 1984. That agreement remains in effect until July 1, 2047.
Under that agreement, Hong Kong's judiciary is to remain independent, and any attempt by politicians to subjugate the decisions of the judiciary to their wishes would constitute a breach of the agreement.
It follows that in directing the members of Hong Kong's judiciary to make themselves subservient to political leadership, the white paper is in breach of the Sino-British agreement on a key point.