Beijing should not interfere in Hong Kong's internal affairs
Bernard Lee's letter ("Hong Kong should focus on addressing social issues rather than democracy", July 20) has reminded me of the policy address delivered by then governor Chris Patten in the Legislative Council in 1996.
Mr Lee's contention that "Hong Kong will always be part of China and will have as much power as China allows" may be in line with the white paper recently issued by the State Council but is blatantly inconsistent with the Basic Law.
The mini constitution has already clearly delineated the scope of the central government's power with respect to our city.
Under the Basic Law, Hong Kong enjoys a high degree of autonomy and executive, legislative and independent judicial power whereas the central government is responsible for the foreign affairs and defence of the special administrative region.
Forming our own government and electing the leader of the city comes within the scope of Hong Kong's own autonomy. I fail to see any legitimate ground for Beijing interfering with our internal affairs.
Your correspondent said he supports universal suffrage, "but this cannot be more important than the pressing livelihood issues affecting Hong Kong". Indeed, the very reason for full democracy is to have an accountable government which listens to citizens, acts in the best interests of Hong Kong, and enhances living standards.