Advertisement
OpinionLetters

Letters to the Editor, September 27, 2014

I refer to Peter Lok's letter in which he writes that there is a requirement for a 2,000-metre separation between two in-line runways.

Reading Time:5 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Cleaners are being denied benefits. Photo: Edward Wong
Letters

I refer to Peter Lok's letter in which he writes that there is a requirement for a 2,000-metre separation between two in-line runways ("Four runways not feasible at Chek Lap Kok", September 14). There are, in fact, no international air regulations governing the layout of in-line runways.
I, however, was also incorrect in asserting in my letter ("Four runways option cheaper than Airport Authority's proposal", September 8) that such a proposal for Heathrow had been abandoned. I have since been corrected by the promoters of this Heathrow proposal, who have pointed out that, in fact, far from being abandoned, their proposal for an additional in-line runway is one of those shortlisted by the authority.
Advertisement

If the proposal for Heathrow was also adopted for Chek Lap Kok, one north runway would be used for landing and the other for departures. There would be a similar arrangement for two runways on the south side.

How is it possible for the reclamation to be cut back to land only required for third and fourth runways? Simply because the new passenger terminal shown on the website of the Airport Authority is no longer required. The additional capacity generated by the new runways is already provided for by the two new terminals currently under construction as the Midfield Development and West Apron Expansion. These two new terminals together almost double the existing capacity.

Advertisement

Before committing to expenditure of HK$130 billion on a scheme that will only result in one runway and a reclamation that is significantly larger than justified, the Airport Authority really should have a rethink about cheaper and more attractive alternatives.

R. J. F. Brothers, Sai Kung

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x