Advertisement

Letters to the Editor, November 14, 2016

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
People's Liberation Army’s Hong Kong garrison holds an xercise at the Castle Peak training ground. Photo: K. Y. Cheng

NPC Standing Committee was out of order

Advertisement

I refer to the report, “Lawyers in silent protest over Beijing oaths ruling” (November 9).

We pride ourselves on our legal system, which ensures the separation of powers. However, this has been undermined by the National People’s Congress Standing Committee.

After the oath-taking incident, the Standing Committee ruled on its interpretation of ­Article 104 of the Basic Law. I would not agree with a ruling that the lawmakers were not being serious when they gave the oath, that they should not be given a second chance and that they should be disqualified.

Although I disagree with the behaviour of Sixtus Baggio Leung Chung-hang and Yau Wai-ching when they were ­taking the oath and insulting their Chinese identity, I do not think the intervention of the NPC was the right solution.

Advertisement

I agree with former lawmaker and barrister Martin Lee Chu-ming, who said the involvement of the NPC Standing Committee and its ruling were “like a tank crashing into Hong Kong’s legal system”. It raises doubts about whether it will be possible for the judiciary to ­remain independent and whether the Basic Law can be protected.

In fact, the rule of law is the most important core value for Hong Kong. It is what enables this city to remain prosperous and competitive with its other rivals in the region.

loading
Advertisement