Advertisement
OpinionLetters

Letters to the Editor, January 7, 2018

3-MIN READ3-MIN
A flooded area of Dongguan after it was hit by Typhoon Hato. Photo: Reuters
Letters

Climate sceptic and denier – a big difference

I refer to the letter by G. Bailey (“Warmer global climate does have benefits”, December 16) which once again tried to ­promote some long-debunked climate myths.

G. Bailey’s repeated publication of these climate myths would only serve to mislead the public and hamper efforts to mitigate human-caused climate change.

Advertisement

Readers can refer to our previous letters (in 2016) debunking these myths (“Established laws of physics used to make climate projections”; “The adverse ­impact of climate change now proved beyond doubt”).

If your correspondent reads the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or at least the Summary for Policymakers, it should not be difficult for him to find out that (to a various extent) the increase in extreme heat events, the increase in frequency and intensity of heavy precipitation, and the increase in extreme sea level events had been attributed to the human-caused greenhouse gas ­emissions.
Advertisement

It is common sense to say that extreme heat is detrimental to human health.

Extreme rainfall will increase the risk of flooding and landslides, causing disruption to socio-economic activities at least and casualties at worst.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x