When Hong Kong needs more land for housing and progress, why rule out reclamation and country park fringes?
But even then, there will still not be sufficient land for Hong Kong to house its citizens decently, instead of in rabbit hutches. Hong Kong needs more land for its commercial activities, for logistics, warehousing, and container storage facilities. It also needs land for the innovation and technology, creative, and recycling industries, for tourism, and an expanded financial sector. We need more land for hospitals and elderly homes as well.
Residents divided over using parks for housing: Greenpeace survey
Time to renegotiate policy that allows 150 mainland Chinese to settle in Hong Kong every day
If we plan for a declining population, we will stagnate, much like some economies that are facing a similar situation. This is not what we want for Hong Kong.
If there was no reclamation in Hong Kong, there would be no Sha Tin, Tsuen Wan, Tai Po, Tseung Kwan O, Tuen Mun or Tung Chung as we know them, as they were all built partially on reclaimed land. The total land area of Singapore has been increased by about 24 per cent through reclamation and Macau by 160 per cent.
Watch: Explaining Hong Kong’s housing crisis
Why can’t we reclaim outside Victoria Harbour? Why can’t we use the periphery of country parks with low ecological value for homes, when currently 40 per cent of Hong Kong’s total area is designated for country parks and only 6.9 per cent is for housing?