Advertisement
Advertisement
Hong Kong Basic Law
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Queues around the block at Immigration Tower in Wan Chai, as Hongkongers rush to apply for British National (Overseas) and British Dependent Territories Citizen documents on March 28, 1996. Hong Kong returned to Chinese sovereignty on July 1 the following year. Photo: Martin Chan

Britain’s denial of citizenship stings because Hong Kong feels betrayed on ‘two systems’

Inevitably, I then visited the comments section which, by early Tuesday evening, had attracted well over 200 missives. Practically everyone posted negative views, which is perhaps understandable, given the none-too-cryptic trigger the article had been wrapped in.

One thing to bear in mind, though, is that when the British officials were working on their strategy for dealing with the handover, presumably in the backs of their minds was the idea that Beijing would go out of its way to deliver in spirit on the “one country, two systems” principle of governance.

Had the incoming landlord subsequently lived up to these expectations, I am sure that many readers would have pretty much skimmed through the article and concluded that it didn’t really matter: “all’s well that ends well”.

Watch: What does ‘one country, two systems’ mean?

The reality of ‘one country, two systems’: Beijing has ultimate control

That history has, unfortunately, proven this not to be the case, I contend, underpins the reaction: because it suggests that a whole lot of local people now wish they could have been able to take up British citizenship at the time.

It is never a good thing to be on the receiving end of betrayal, whether real or perceived.

Jason Ali, Mui Wo

Post