-
Advertisement
Hong Kong housing
OpinionLetters

Letters | How Hong Kong’s Carrie Lam can win with Lantau Tomorrow vision: make it a model for clarity

  • Hong Kong has historically thrived on reclamation, so its benefits can’t be discounted
  • However, the government must set a high standard in accountability to allay public concerns

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
A hiker rests atop a rock on Lo Fu Tau, a popular hiking trail in Lantau North Country Park, flanked by Discovery Bay and Peng Chau in November 2018. The previous month, Chief Executive Carrie Lam announced plans to realise an ambitious plan called Lantau Tomorrow Vision under which artificial islands, spanning 1,700 hectares, would be built off the eastern coast of Lantau Island. Photo: Robert Ng
Letters
I refer to the article, “Housing to be built on Fanling golf course, Hong Kong government confirms” (February 20). It is delightful to see the government endorse and outline implementation plans for several recommendations stipulated by the Task Force on Land Supply. While I fully support the government for its courage to execute these short-term policies, Hongkongers must wake up to the multiple possibilities offered by reclamation.
I agree with the task force report that reclamation is the most effective in mitigating land shortage. Planning and execution of both near-shore reclamation and the Lantau Tomorrow Vision should not be delayed, for the sake of future generations.
I find it shocking that most young people do not support reclamation. Being part of the millennial generation, I value environmental conservation, and I understand the risks of “throwing money into the sea”. But history shows that the success of Hong Kong in the past decades would not have been possible without reclamation – Sha Tin, Tseung Kwan O and even Central are examples. We have no better option than to align with the chief executive and trust in her efforts to minimise the potential risks.
Advertisement

However, to demonstrate accountability, the government should make the Lantau Tomorrow project a pilot for increased transparency in the planning processes. As the government promised prioritising a detailed study on the first 1,000 hectares to be reclaimed around Kau Yi Chau, the necessity of the remaining 700 hectares should be open for discussion at a later stage.

Meanwhile, we should expect to encounter difficulties when executing short-term measures, such as converting brownfield sites and using private farmland. Their scattered distribution and the burden development there would add to current transport systems are just some of the obstacles.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x