bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

sponsorType

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Letters

I’m very concerned about why Singapore Airlines flight SQ423 from Mumbai, upon being informed of a bomb threat, didn’t land at the first available airport instead of carrying on to Singapore (“Singapore Airlines flight escorted by fighter jets after bomb hoax”, March 26). Some news reports said the call was received shortly after take-off. Surely landing at any of the airports en route was a safer option?
If they thought the threat was probably a hoax and therefore of low risk, then why have Singapore air force fighter jets escort the plane? These decisions don’t seem to make any sense based on what information is available.
As a Singaporean, I am naturally anxious to know why my national flag carrier made these seemingly inexplicable decisions.
Anuradha Singh, Mid-Levels


Air India pilot taken off duty over intoxication allegations in Canada

Just how close did a PLA drone come to the heart of Taipei during drill?

China-Europe travel market’s resilience keeps Air France-KLM optimistic despite headwinds

Airbus scores major win in China with orders for 148 A320 aircraft

Aviation

Why was bomb-threat Singapore Airlines flight allowed to fly to destination?

Singapore Airlines’ first Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner prepares to land at Changi Airport on March 28, 2018. After Flight SQ423 left Mumbai on March 25, 2019, the airline received a call claiming that there was a bomb on board. Photo: Reuters

Opinion

Star Alliance

.css-sioo19{color:#c79a00;}Letters | Why was bomb-threat Singapore Airlines flight allowed to fly to destination?

Letters | Why was bomb-threat Singapore Airlines flight allowed to fly to destination?