Advertisement

Letters | Hong Kong protests: use of emergency powers to ban masks sets a dangerous precedent

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
0
A protester wears a gas mask and holds up his hand to represent the five demands protesters are making of the government, at a rally on October 4, ahead of the ban on wearing masks. Photo: AP
Watching the past few months of protests in Hong Kong, I find the use of a tool or weapon has been news only when it first happens. I remember the first time a police officer fired a service revolver as a warning shot and the first time protesters threw a Molotov cocktail, both in August.

Both these events made the headlines when they occurred. Today, neither the firing of live rounds nor the throwing of firebombs are seen as very newsworthy events. Once a line is crossed, it’s difficult to go back.

What I am afraid to see is the Emergency Regulations Ordinance become an accepted weapon in the arsenal of the government. It is an antiquated and authoritarian ordinance that allows the chief executive to effectively govern by decree. Although Hong Kong never had true democracy, the rule of law at least protected the rights and freedoms of Hongkongers. The ordinance allows many of these freedoms to be suspended, and could be used to enact what is essentially martial law.
Let us hope that the anti-mask law was a one-time use of the ordinance. We must ensure that the use of the ordinance does not become a commonplace occurrence, lest we slip further into authoritarianism.

Michael Du, Toronto, Canada

Banning masks will curtail rights but won’t stop protests

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2-3x faster
1.1x
220 WPM
Slow
Normal
Fast
1.1x