Advertisement

Letters | Hong Kong protesters are angry – but is it a cry for freedoms or nativist bigotry?

Reading Time:1 minute
Why you can trust SCMP
A man walks past a wall spray-painted with an anti-China message on October 7. Photo: AP
You asked for readers’ views on Chief Secretary Matthew Cheung’s statement that he “didn’t know what the biggest cause of public anger was”.

Of course we know the “five demands” that must be delivered, and “not one less”. But I believe there is rather more to it than that, judging by the words of protesters themselves. There is a strong tinge of nativism in their anger.

Consider this from your investigative article on October 23 (“Hong Kong protests: from throwing bricks at police vans to becoming experts at putting out tear gas, meet the teenagers who are risking it all for their ideals”):
Advertisement

“Their yearnings, as revealed on social media, imagine a Hong Kong where people speak Cantonese, patronise family-run shops and not chain stores and pharmacies catering to mainland Chinese tourists, and care for one another as neighbours in close-knit communities.”

In any other country, in any other context, this would be criticised as nativist bigotry. Recently the comedian John Cleese was savaged for suggesting that London is “not really an English city any more”; this is exactly the same sentiment we see above.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x