-
Advertisement
Xinjiang
OpinionLetters

Letters | What Arsenal got wrong about Mesut Ozil’s defence of Uygur Muslims in China

2-MIN READ2-MIN
A supporter of China’s Muslim Uygur minority holds up a poster of Arsenal’s German midfielder Mesut Ozil with a message reading “Thanks for being our voice”, during a demonstration in Istanbul, Turkey, on December 14. Ozil, who is of Turkish origin, expressed support for Uygurs in Xinjiang and criticised Muslim countries for their failure to speak up for them. Photo: AFP
Letters
I refer to “Chinese state broadcaster drops Arsenal game after Mesut Ozil attacks treatment of Uygurs” (December 15). In distancing itself from Ozil’s defence of Uygurs, the football club Arsenal may have been too modest in saying that it has a “principle of not involving itself in politics”.
Many British football clubs object to racist jeers or taunts by fans against players who belong to visible minorities. At one point, any such objections to racist behaviour might have been seen as just a moral stand rather than also political but, given current anti-discrimination legislation, they are also political.

Any sports team that refused to play in South Africa during the apartheid era, or refused to play in a segregated stadium, was taking both a moral and a political stand.

Advertisement

It might have been more accurate for Arsenal to say that it does not involve itself in politics off the playing field.

Bruce Couchman, Ottawa

Ozil’s critique of China strengthens US case

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x