Letters | Did Trump really make America safer by killing top Iranian general?

US President Donald Trump’s ordering of the killing of Iranian military leader Qassem Soleimani will rank as one of the most reckless actions of a president, who once again put his personal political interest above national security.

Certainly, Soleimani deserved to meet his bitter fate. He was behind the killing of hundreds of American soldiers in Iraq while threatening and acting against American allies. However, killing him without considering the potentially dire regional repercussions and without a strategy, under the guise of national security concerns, is hard to fathom.

He made the decision to assassinate Soleimani seven months ago, but he gave the order now to serve self-interest, especially in this election year and while he is awaiting the outcome of an impeachment trial in the Senate.

During the Senate briefing on Iran led by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Secretary of Defence Mark Esper and CIA director Gina Haspel, they produced no evidence that there was an imminent danger of an attack on four American embassies orchestrated by Soleimani, as Trump has claimed. In fact, Esper said openly in a January 12 interview that he saw no evidence of this. Republican Senator Mike Lee labelled it as “probably the worst briefing I have seen, at least on a military issue”.

Now, having failed to produce evidence of imminent danger, the Trump administration claims that the killing of Soleimani was part of a long-term deterrence strategy.