Letters | Why delay in passing Hong Kong archives law does not surprise
- Delay would appear to be the default position for matters relating to government records and archives, when their management should be conducted within the framework of an archives law
- Seven years since a subcommittee was set up to consider the need for legislation, the public is still waiting for its final report and recommendations
Time to press ahead with archives law
It is not good enough for the director of administration, when faced with evidence of the failure of departments to meet administrative guidelines on archiving emails, to merely say that departments would be “reminded” to archive records within the appropriate time frame.
Failures of this nature demand a robust response. Had Esther Leung Yuet-yin had recourse to an archives law that set out mandatory requirements for government record keeping, enforceable by sanctions, it is unlikely that such a situation would have arisen. And had it done so, it could have been dealt with in a firm and effective manner.
Whether it is ensuring that Hong Kong government agencies meet international standards for website and social media archiving, or internal procedures for filing and retaining departmental correspondence, the management of government records and archives should be conducted within the framework of an archives law.
Hong Kong as a community deserves better from its government.
Don Brech, former director, Government Records Service
Help us understand what you are interested in so that we can improve SCMP and provide a better experience for you. We would like to invite you to take this five-minute survey on how you engage with SCMP and the news.