LettersQuestion for Hong Kong police: which is the deadlier weapon, a gun or a camera?
The force has been blatantly violating the Basic Law. Article 27 states that “Hong Kong residents shall have freedom of speech, of the press and of publication”. If the force had done nothing wrong or illegal, why shut up the mouths and cameras of the journalists with pepper spray? Such actions are nothing but barbaric and authoritarian.
Under no circumstances should officers abuse their right to enforce social distancing rules by prosecuting citizens while randomly packing together four or now eight strangers, and then claiming they violated the rules. This is absurd and totally unacceptable. If that is not abuse of power, what is?
When hundreds of officers storm shopping malls and areas where no violation of the law is seen, their action is completely unjustified, provocative and infuriating. Any action seemingly against the force is arbitrarily judged to be offensive and subject to prosecution and arrest, while freedom of the press is pushed aside, with reporters intimidated and stamped on. Which is the deadlier weapon, a gun or a camera?
Helen Lo, Lai Chi Kok