LettersWhy Hong Kong civil servants are answerable only to the city
- Hong Kong taxpayers fund the civil service, which Article 99 of the Basic Law specifies is responsible to the local government
- The service’s reputation for professionalism and political neutrality was built over decades

There are many reasons Nip’s remarks are problematic. For starters, Article 99 of the Basic Law specifies that Hong Kong’s public servants are “responsible to the government of the Hong Kong SAR”. This is precisely because the mainland government has different values.
There is also a more self-apparent reason for Article 99. Hong Kong civil servants are entirely paid for by Hong Kong taxpayers. Just as an employee works for the employer who pays his salary, it only makes sense for the city’s civil servants to answer to the people of Hong Kong only.
It bodes ill for Hong Kong to have a politically appointed top government official flouting the Basic Law in public.
We expect civil servants to abide by time-honoured precedents and written policy, rather than to exercise their own political judgments or promote their own political agenda when performing their tasks.