Advertisement
LettersWhy the Cathay Pacific bailout is a raw deal for Hong Kong
- The bailout reduces the incentive for the company to adapt to the post-coronavirus environment
2-MIN READ2-MIN
1

In response to David Dodwell’s column “Why market fears of an Air China takeover of Cathay Pacific proved unfounded” (June 14) and others commenting on the government’s recent financial dealings with the airline, the Lion Rock Institute is steadfastly against the bailout. It will be ultimately detrimental to Hong Kong’s aviation industry by reducing the incentive for the bailed out company to fully and rapidly adapt to the post-coronavirus environment.
Furthermore, by becoming a part-owner of an operator, the government will have the incentive to ensure its success by eliminating any potential competition. This will harm all consumers of Hong Kong’s aviation industry and slow necessary and innovative changes in the sector.
We firmly believe the company’s productive capacity to provide aviation services would have survived and thrived even further if the financial restructuring proceeded without government involvement.
Advertisement
We fear the public does not view this bailout to be of Cathay Pacific but rather its equity owners and creditors. The public being kept ignorant of who is benefiting raises serious issues of propriety.

01:29
Hong Kong government to bail out Cathay Pacific with HK$30 billion in loans and direct stake
Hong Kong government to bail out Cathay Pacific with HK$30 billion in loans and direct stake
Perhaps most importantly, young people around the world again see overleveraged asset owners – that is, the wealthy – never having to bear the full consequences of their decisions while they themselves are asked to do just that.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x