-
Advertisement
LGBTQ
OpinionLetters

Letters | Don’t conflate Hong Kong same-sex marriage rights with views on religion or adoption

  • Same-sex marriage does not automatically impact child adoption rights. And the religious faithful can continue to practise their beliefs – but must not impose them on others

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Any religious group is at liberty to be against same-sex marriage, just as LGBT couples in Hong Kong that wish to get married should be at liberty to do so. Photo: Shutterstock
Letters
There are certain flaws in Anson Chan’s argument against gay marriage (“Society not yet ready for gay marriage”, October 12).
Chan raises two points. First, he claims that allowing same-sex marriage will automatically bring changes to other laws – he mentions child adoption as one. Marriage and adoption are two separate issues, and one does not automatically change the other. So, for example, we could allow same-sex marriage but not allow that union to adopt a child. They are two separate situations, and each should be argued separately.

His second point is that same-sex marriage in some way interferes with religious freedom. But religious freedom means you are free to practise your religious belief; it does not mean you can inflict your view on the rest of society. That notion, so popular during the Inquisition, fortunately is no longer with us. So they are perfectly at liberty to be against the practice of same-sex marriage, just as those who wish to engage in it should be at liberty to do so.

Advertisement

David Osborne, Quarry Bay

Religious views have no place in civil rights debate

Advertisement

I refer to Anson Chan’s letter of October 12. One of his concerns was that same-sex marriage seemingly contravenes the Christian gospel. I must point out the obvious – that Hong Kong is a secular society. We are not, and must not, be a theocracy.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x