Letters | Hong Kong chief sets poor example by refusing to answer questions
- It appears the city’s chief executive is putting personal whim above an established and valuable procedure which has certainly improved communication between executive and legislature
It appears that the city’s chief executive is putting personal whim above an established and valuable procedure which has certainly improved communication between executive and legislature. Her subordinates – bureau secretaries, permanent secretaries, department heads and directorate officials – now have good reason to follow suit: first, their boss, that is the chief executive, is doing exactly that; and second, their experience of attending such sessions has also been not at all pleasant.
Notwithstanding, attendance by officials is part and parcel of their duties. The chief executive should not, and must not, lead in dereliction of duty.
Recently, a much talked about subject has been the latest coronavirus social distancing measures allowing six persons to gather indoors versus four persons outdoors. The government has a duty to explain clearly and logically to our citizens why it would be safer for six persons to gather in restaurants, eating, drinking and chatting with their masks off, as opposed to the same number of people in open air, with their masks on.
The logic (if any) behind such decisions is baffling, to put it mildly.
Francis Lo, North Point
Can the government start making sense, please?