Advertisement
Letters | Job cuts will help Cathay Pacific navigate to profitability
- The alternative – allowing Hong Kong’s flagship airline to go under with all 33,000 jobs – would have been much worse
Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP

Rishi Teckchandani displays a false sense of economy in his analysis of the Cathay Pacific Airways decision to lay off thousands of workers (“Cathay should have been left to market forces”, November 12). Would he have preferred the airline to have failed completely, taking with it all 33,000 jobs, to the restructuring that preserved employment for the majority while offering those who were let go the possibility of re-employment?
Similarly, the government made a strategic investment in Cathay Pacific to ensure that Hong Kong remains a viable transport hub, a decision that was, again, based on the preservation of jobs – and not the bailout that Mr Teckchandani suggests.
The decision to let go of 8,500 staff was the best way to navigate the airline back to profitability, preserving as many jobs as possible.
Advertisement
Mark Peaker, The Peak

03:43
Cathay Pacific Airways announces its largest job cuts in history
Cathay Pacific Airways announces its largest job cuts in history
Outrage at Cathay’s lack of communication with staff
Advertisement
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x