Advertisement
Letters | EU deal with China is a win for economics over rights concerns
Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
After seven years of negotiations, the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment between China and the European Union has finally been concluded. For China, this deal not only deepens economic relations with the EU but also gives Beijing some breathing space amid the trade war with the United States.
For the EU, this agreement levels the playing field for European companies and investors in the Chinese market, while committing Beijing to rules on, for example, technology transfers. Most importantly, the agreement serves as a testimony to the world that despite Europe’s concerns over China’s human rights violations, economic development takes precedence in EU-China relations.
Indeed, not so long ago, the EU had voiced “grave concerns” about the human rights situation in Hong Kong and Xinjiang. However, after paying lip service to its domestic supporters and the international community, the EU once again decided to stay true to itself in international politics, which is to maximise its interests by acting in a pragmatic manner.
02:56
Germany presses China on Hong Kong security law, seeks access to Uygurs in Xinjiang
Germany presses China on Hong Kong security law, seeks access to Uygurs in Xinjiang
As with the Communist Party of China, the legitimacy of the EU depends largely on its economic performance. And as China became the EU’s largest trade partner for the first time in 2020, it is a sound, strategic choice for the EU to conclude this deal with Beijing.
Advertisement
The agreement has to be approved by the European Parliament before coming into effect. It must be noted that the current presidency of the Council of the European Union is with Portugal, a staunch supporter of Chinese investment, while the next presidency is with Slovenia, a huge beneficiary of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. They are unlikely to set agendas against the agreement or oppose it.
Second, and more importantly, while the European Parliament tends to give opinions about “soft” issues such as human rights, when it comes to “hard” and tangible topics related to economic and commercial interests, it has often shown a strong unity.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x