-
Advertisement
Coronavirus Hong Kong
OpinionLetters

Letters | Hong Kong coronavirus vaccines: non-resident elderly family members left out

  • While authorities have been helpful in making arrangements for non-resident elderly family members to remain, getting them a vaccine is a different story

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
5
A Community Vaccination Centre at the Hong Kong Central Library in Causeway Bay on March 8. The   vaccination rate remains low, with herd immunity feared to be as long as 300 days away. Photo: Dickson Lee
Letters
It is now a full month since Hong Kong’s Covid-19 vaccination programme was launched on February 23, and there is still no plan for the vaccination of a group of highly vulnerable people – non-resident elderly family members of Hong Kong residents.

As dependency visas are not usually granted to parents or parents in-law of Hong Kong residents, such family members are often required to remain in Hong Kong on the basis of other visas such as the Exit-Entry Permit for Travelling to and from Hong Kong and Macau (EEP).

Although the Immigration Department has helpfully arranged to extend the validity periods of these EEPs during the course of the pandemic, thereby sparing such persons from having to undertake risky travel to extend this validity, their ability to register for vaccination remains unresolved.

02:07

WHO chief slams ‘grotesque’ vaccine gap, asks producers to license technology to others

WHO chief slams ‘grotesque’ vaccine gap, asks producers to license technology to others

Any resident with such elderly family members is likely to be given the runaround by various government departments.

Advertisement

The representative on the Covid Vaccination Programme hotline told us to contact the Immigration Department, who suggested we contact the Department of Health, who simply told us that my elderly mother-in-law, who will be 70 this year and who has lived with us since before we relocated to Hong Kong, was not entitled to vaccination.

The current policy discriminates between residents and non-residents when obviously the virus does not. Perhaps such persons could be required to pay the cost of the vaccination? Perhaps they could have a lower priority than non-residents, though arguably not below lower-risk groups such as those at 30 years and older, who are now permitted to seek vaccination.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x