Advertisement
Hong Kong economy
OpinionLetters

Letters | Accounting regulatory overhaul will sharpen Hong Kong’s competitive edge

  • The proposed bill would bring Hong Kong in line with international practice and increase the accounting profession’s accountability and transparency, and public confidence in it

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
A view of Victoria Harbour and commercial buildings along it. Photo: AFP
Letters
Hong Kong’s amendment bill to expand the regulatory and investigative powers of the Financial Reporting Council to cover all certified public accountants – and to rename it the Accounting and Financial Reporting Council (AFRC) – is an important piece of legislation to increase the competitive edge of businesses and professional services here.
The bill proposes a regulatory model, similar to that used in Britain and Singapore, that will save compliance costs for the accounting profession and rationalise the regulatory resources hitherto spent by both the council and the Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Most importantly, the bill seeks to increase the accounting profession’s accountability and transparency, as well as public confidence in it.

Firstly and most importantly, special attention must be paid to the transitional stage when most of the investigative and disciplinary functions of the Institute of Certified Public Accountants are subsumed under the AFRC. A working group should be set up between the institute and the AFRC to ensure the transition is smooth and seamless.

Advertisement

Second, the government must give the AFRC sufficient resources to discharge its statutory functions independently.

Third, the AFRC’s regulatory approach must be to raise the standards of the profession and protect the public interest. The profession should not be placed in a more onerous and hostile regulatory environment than before. The approach or regulatory culture cannot be spelt out or guaranteed in the provisions of the bill. But ensuring the quality of the AFRC’s frontline staff and maintaining a constant and open dialogue with the members of the profession will ease much doubt and concern.

Advertisement

Lastly, given that Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Christopher Hui Ching-yu once suggested that the bill was a mere moving of regulatory functions from the institute to the AFRC, I hope the vast experience of the institute’s staff is favourably taken into account when the AFRC recruits staff for its expanded functions.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x