-
Advertisement
Hong Kong environmental issues
OpinionLetters

Letters | Nuclear, not solar, energy should power Hong Kong’s carbon neutrality push

  • Readers argue for increased use of nuclear power, and discuss how the city can better prevent boar attacks on humans

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
1
Solar panels on a roof in Hong Lok Yuen in Tai Po in July 2019. Photo: Winson Wong
Letters
As we have solar panels on our rooftop here in Discovery Bay, I’d like to comment on the letter, “Solar power needs a bigger push” (January 19).
First, CLP pays us for the solar electricity we feed into its grid under the “feed-in-tariff”scheme, currently over five times what we pay CLP for the electricity we consume. So there is a subsidy involved, which must remain to make it viable for consumers to install photovoltaic panels.

Second, Hong Kong is a vertical city, whereas Australia is a largely horizontal one. We have many more high-rise buildings than Australia. That means fewer rooftops per capita on which to put solar panels.

Advertisement
Therefore solar power at scale would have to be on our “brownfield” sites. These are nowhere near enough to lead us to “net zero”.

The fundamental problem with solar energy – apart from not being able to produce energy at night – is that it is “energy-dilute”. Nuclear power, by contrast, is very “energy-dense”. Thus California’s Ivanpah solar farm is spread across 3,500 acres and has a gross capacity of 392 megawatts, while the state’s Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant takes up 750 acres and has a capacity of 2,256MW .

Advertisement

Hong Kong gets 25 per cent of its electricity from the Daya Bay nuclear power station. Imagine the amount of land needed to generate the equivalent amount of electricity from solar power.

So why do we so rarely discuss nuclear power for Hong Kong? There are four nuclear stations in Guangdong from which we could take power.
Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x