Letters | China’s rescue of its property market must not seed the next crash
- Readers discuss the need for reform to moderate the cycle of boom and bust, the advantages of the financial hubs of Singapore and Hong Kong, and the role of language teachers in an age of AI
A rekindling of these forces could be disastrous for the central government, leading to soaring home prices and another build-up of unmanageable debt among developers. The cycle of leverage crackdowns would repeat itself.
The current property market revival may provide temporary relief, but without genuine reforms, China’s property sector is doomed to repeat its boom-and-bust cycle.
Nicholas To, Kennedy Town
Look to Singapore and Hong Kong amid US banking woes
Investors would usually deposit their funds with banks that offer the most attractive interest rates. They are unlikely to examine the financial soundness of each bank they do business with, as they rely on the central banks to perform supervision, as part of the central banks’ responsibility to safeguard stability and protect consumers.
Despite the Treasury’s assurances that the US banking system is “sound and resilient” and able to weather the economic downturn, investors are still jittery.
Fortunately, the negative news buffeting the banking industries in the West pose no systemic risks to Singapore and Hong Kong because these two are reputable global wealth hubs with a strong regulatory framework and rule of law.
Hence, for investors who are contemplating relationships with banks in a financial centre that has sound regulation, rigorous supervision and effective governance, Singapore and Hong Kong stand out among the competitors.
Tony Lim Kheng Yee, Singapore
Language courses should teach AI literacy
The advent of generative artificial intelligence like ChatGPT may have panicked many language teachers who fear losing their jobs. But in fact, language centres in higher education can capitalise on this trend and adapt to a new role of promoting AI literacy.
AI literacy refers to the ability to assess, interact with and utilise AI technology. Building on this, language centres may adapt their course curriculum in line with the latest research findings.
ChatGPT may now be banned in some places, but once the relevant regulations are in place, it would be difficult to stop people using AI. We should instead help students cultivate their ability to think independently.
Metalinguistic awareness should be one of the key outcomes of future language courses. Critiques of AI text could become routine in language courses. Students could evaluate the passages by using the target language, say English in English classes, to talk about the language of the text, like grammar and tone. They should identify mistakes and fix them.
Meanwhile, we can teach students how to communicate with generative AI by inserting specific prompts to cross-check the accuracy of an AI-generated response. Ultimately, we can ensure students leave the classroom with a skill that cannot be taken over by AI.
Language centres have the responsibility to position our next generation in a world shaped by AI. We can equip our young with AI literacy to grapple with technological challenges – in other words, the power to command robots, rather than the other way round.
Alison Ng, assistant lecturer, Centre for Applied English Studies, University of Hong Kong