-
Advertisement
Hong Kong
OpinionLetters

Letters | Does recording of Cathay Pacific cabin crew breach privacy law?

  • Readers discuss an audio recording that resulted in the firing of three airline staff, the use of ChatGPT at Hong Kong universities, and support that would benefit the city’s elderly

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
62
Cathay Pacific staff at the company’s headquarters in Chek Lap Kok on May 25. Photo: Sam Tsang
Letters
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form. Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification.
It is a pity that three Cathay Pacific cabin crew members were sacked this week after their private conversation, in which they poured scorn on travellers from the mainland who struggled to speak English, went public.

Cathay swiftly took action after an audio recording of their casual chat was shared on the hugely popular Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. The incident was also picked up by People’s Daily, which published an online commentary criticising Cathay’s corporate culture for “worshipping foreigners” and respecting Hongkongers but looking down on mainlanders.

Advertisement

One neglected aspect of the whole affair was the secret taping of the private chat between the flight attendants by a passenger seated near their work area. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data should come forward and explain to the public whether such an act of recording a private conversation breaches the local privacy law.

Understandably, the passenger who heard the exchange – a mainlander who has lived in Hong Kong for over a decade – was upset with the flight attendants poking fun at a mainland traveller who couldn’t speak English, but does that justify secretly recording the conversation and exposing it to the media?

Advertisement

They sounded unkind but the chat was a lighthearted exchange among colleagues in their own rest area. There is no reason it should be blown up into an issue about discrimination resulting in sackings.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x