Advertisement
Advertisement
Hong Kong housing
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Debris from a landslide, which occurred after record rainfall, below the Redhill Peninsula residential development, on September 12. Photo: Bloomberg

Letters | How Hong Kong can crack down on illegal structures quickly and cost-effectively

  • Readers discuss cases of unauthorised construction at a luxury residential estate, and unsafe driving on the city’s roads
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form. Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification.
The recent torrential rain exposed the serious, long-standing and potentially life-threatening problem of unauthorised building works in Hong Kong. The cliffside houses at Redhill Peninsula are just the tip of the iceberg.
Secretary for Development Bernadette Linn Hon-ho inherited this problem from her predecessors, including Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor when she was secretary for development. Even the able and efficient Mrs Lam failed to solve this problem, despite her pledge to strictly enforce the law, including in the New Territories.

A Buildings Department surveyor has said the department has limited resources and Linn has said they need to prioritise enforcement measures. Thus, it may actually be a lot more efficient and cost-effective for the government to simply embark upon a campaign for voluntary identification and rectification of unauthorised building works and illegal land use.

The government could impose a one-year deadline for all property owners to voluntarily identify, report, and rectify, remove or cease all illegal or unauthorised building works, and unauthorised occupation of government land, as the case may be, no matter how questionable or marginal the problem is.

For the property owners taking responsibility, the government would only impose the minimum penalty – or even a nominal penalty – if it is satisfied with the scope and truthfulness of the identification made and the degree of completeness of the rectification or reinstatement works. The idea is to encourage voluntary restoration work on altered premises based on the approved building plans and land demarcation within the grace period.

The government should make it clear that, upon expiry of the deadline, those who fail to come forward to identify, report and reinstate would face very serious consequences, including the imposition of hefty fines and a criminal record.

Fines may not be enough as a deterrent, as money is often not a matter of real concern to offending property owners. If needed, the Legislative Council should be called upon to amend the relevant laws so as to enable stringent punishment by imprisonment. The deterrent effect this will achieve should be more than justified.

The government should stress the likely consequence of imprisonment. This should hopefully be enough to sound the necessary alarm among delinquent property owners. The government must prosecute high-profile offenders, no matter how short the prison term.

The one-year limit would also helpful in terms of setting a real key performance indicator in the chief executive’s policy address for monitoring progress and measuring the success of this campaign.

David Mak, Ho Man Tin

Driver education needed to ensure pedestrian safety

The longer I live in Hong Kong, the more I feel like the roads are becoming increasingly like the Wild West. Pedestrians have virtually zero right of passage when it comes to crossing the road, while cyclists, outside the New Territories, appear to have even fewer rights on the road.

Even when the green light flashes and pedestrians can cross the road, motorists speed up to the crossing, so that pedestrians have to wait for signs of safety when they should be crossing straight away. That being said, even when the red light is on for motorists, it doesn’t always stop them from going.

Zebra crossings, on the other hand, seem a little bit better as long as you’re not easily intimidated by cars speeding up to you so they can go first.

The crossings, which advise pedestrians to look left or right before proceeding can get really scary. Even when it seems safe to cross, motorists can drift around the corner, forgetting to slow down when going around the bend. Therefore, it’s no surprise that there are so many accidents.

The government should try to educate road users on how to drive to ensure that pedestrians are safe, because increased fines for jaywalking alone aren’t going to do that.

Lee Ross, Kowloon City

4