Risks posed by trade war and Federal Reserve policy are graver than investors seem to realise
- Markets must come to terms with the fact that China and the US are too far apart on crucial issues for the trade war to be resolved soon
- When central banks themselves have become sources of volatility, investors must wake up to the dangers of underpricing risk

Yet, closely watched measures of financial volatility remain remarkably subdued, and have even fallen since Trump revived his trade offensive against China. The VIX Index, Wall Street’s so-called fear gauge which measures the implied volatility of the S&P 500 equity index based on options prices, is down 30 per cent since May 13, and as much as 60 per cent since the height of the sell-off last December. Indeed, the S&P 500 itself currently stands a mere 0.6 per cent below its all-time high set on May 3.
A report published by JPMorgan last Friday, which looked at a dozen gauges of volatility across five separate asset classes, noted that “option markets do not embed enough cushion against the significant event risk markets are facing over the coming weeks”. How much extra cushion there should be is debatable. What is clear is that investors are significantly underpricing the risks surrounding the Fed and the trade war.
It is shocking that only six months after the Fed was intending to raise rates two times in 2019, bond markets are now pricing in at least two cuts by the end of this year, and assigning a 100 per cent probability to a reduction next month.
