Macroscope | Next IMF chief must stand up to Trumpian protectionism, but need not be European
- Efforts to change the age limit for the new IMF head look like a ploy to keep the job in European hands, when what’s needed most is knowledge and skill for building global consensus
Rarely has the need to select a new head of the International Monetary Fund on merit been greater than now, and yet the usual manoeuvring to ensure that the job goes to someone of European nationality continues. As a result, potentially strong candidates from, say, China or Japan and elsewhere in and beyond Asia are sidelined.
The challenges are in fact awesome. The multilateral consensus which birthed the IMF and its “Bretton Woods sister” the World Bank 75 years ago is unravelling. Securing an international policy consensus in times of trade and economic war (let alone peace) is becoming that much more difficult.
Ad hoc arrangements such as the Group of Twenty advanced and emerging economies, the Group of Seven and various other “G” combinations are also being undermined by the fracturing of political consensus. That is one reason why the world is drifting rudderless towards economic crisis.
To make his or her voice heard above the din of political populism, the new head of the IMF must have the authority that comes from a sound working knowledge of economics, finance and governance – with a liberal dash of gravitas and diplomacy added to the mix.
