Advertisement
Advertisement
Vice-President Mike Pence and President Donald Trump take part in a welcome ceremony for the new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in Virginia on September 30. With the launch of a formal impeachment inquiry against Trump, US domestic politics has suddenly risen to the top of the list of concerns for financial markets. Photo: AP
Opinion
Macroscope
by Nicholas Spiro
Macroscope
by Nicholas Spiro

The impact of a Trump impeachment would be just too unpredictable for confused markets to cheer it on

  • Hope that the impeachment inquiry may spur Trump to conclude a trade truce with China remains just that – mere hope. Too many variables are at play, including Beijing’s reaction to a weakened Trump presidency. Truth be told, markets have not done too badly under Trump

If the betting markets are to be believed, the chances of US President Donald Trump being impeached by the end of his first term currently stand at just under 70 per cent.

According to PredictIt, a political betting website, the odds have risen sharply since September 24, when the opposition Democratic Party, which controls the House of Representatives, launched an impeachment inquiry into charges that Trump improperly solicited the aid of Ukraine’s president to help dig up dirt on former vice-president Joe Biden. Biden is one of the leading Democratic contenders to take on Trump in next year’s presidential election.

These odds seem far too high, given that it is unclear whether the House will be able to find incontrovertible evidence against Trump (and, more importantly, whether a sufficient number of Trump’s fellow Republicans, who control the Senate, would vote to convict a president from their own party). Yet, the dramatic increase in US political risk injects yet more uncertainty into an already perilous global economic and policymaking environment.

The impeachment investigation – the first since the House impeached former president Bill Clinton in 1998, and only the fourth such action against an American president – could have significant implications for both the trade war and the outcome of next year’s election.

US domestic politics, moreover, has suddenly risen to the top of the list of concerns for financial markets.

However, as I argued previously, investors have long struggled to assess and price political risks accurately, partly because they are not easily quantifiable and require financial analysts to step outside their comfort zone.

The difficulty in perceiving and forecasting US political trends correctly is compounded by the fact that American politics has become even more polarised since Trump became president, and is currently in a state of flux.

The latest indication of this came on Monday with the release of a new opinion poll by Quinnipac University showing that American voters are split 47-47 per cent on whether Trump should be impeached and removed from office. Only a week or so ago, there was a solid majority against impeachment.

If further momentum builds behind the Democrats’ efforts, the health of the US economy will become even more critical to the president’s chances of re-election.

The fallout from the trade war was laid bare on Tuesday when a gauge of US manufacturing output fell deeper into contraction territory, posting its weakest reading since 2009 and heightening concerns that America may be heading for a recession.

The combination of a more politically vulnerable president and a sharper economic slowdown would increase pressure on Trump to agree on a trade truce fairly quickly. This may help explain why the benchmark S&P 500 equity index is still less than 5 per cent shy of its all-time high.

Indeed, some investment strategists are already suggesting that the investigation may be just what is needed to de-escalate the trade conflict. 

Trump knows ending the trade war will help him win in 2020

Not so fast. As JPMorgan rightly observed in a report published on September 25, there are several plausible scenarios for “how the president [would] behave internationally when encircled domestically, and how other countries [would] interact with an embattled president”.

Not only is there a risk – and a significant one at that – that the impeachment proceedings backfire on the Democrats by energising Trump’s voters and increasing his chances of re-election, it is also possible that Beijing will scent blood.

Rather than making the concessions necessary to defuse trade tensions, China could try to sabotage Trump’s re-election bid by stringing out the negotiations, thereby depriving Trump of a “big win” on trade and putting America’s economy under more strain.

Indeed, the only thing that is clear from a market standpoint is that trading the impeachment process is a mug’s game. There are too many imponderables – Trump’s actions and reactions being the most obvious ones – to predict what will happen as the presidential campaign gets under way.

Still, this will not stop American politics becoming a more important determinant of sentiment, particularly given how sensitive markets are to Trump’s latest tweets on the likelihood of a deal with Beijing.

Investors should be careful what they wish for. It is one thing if the impeachment inquiry makes Trump less inclined to escalate the trade war; it is quite another if the inquiry affects his re-election prospects sufficiently to help the Democrats take back the White House.

Although most investors would love to see the back of Trump, a Democratic president poses its own set of problems, especially if the party were to reclaim control of the Senate. While a Democratic president would be more likely to ease trade tensions, mainly to focus on domestic issues, Trump’s tax cuts would be rolled back and there would be much more regulation, putting stock markets under severe strain.

If truth be told, markets have not done too badly under Trump. This is one more reason why investors will struggle to make sense of the impeachment drama.

Nicholas Spiro is a partner at Lauressa Advisory

 

Post