Advertisement
History
Opinion
Regina Ip

Hong Kong is not, and never has been, a ‘stateless nation’. Indulging that fantasy could have disastrous results

  • Hong Kong had a strong connection to China during the colonial era and there was little desire for self-governance
  • Those saying otherwise sell a dangerous delusion at a time when many Hongkongers simply want their orderly society back

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
38
Pro-Beijing supporters wave Chinese flags at Amoy Plaza in Kowloon Bay on September 14. Photo: Sam Tsang

A Hong Kong academic is casting a new, localist light on Hong Kong’s months-long protests, triggered by a controversial rendition law. Brian Fong Chi-hang of the Hong Kong University of Education argued, in a recent article published in The Diplomat, that the Hong Kong protesters represent “a stateless nation struggling for autonomy”.

Drawing strength from Western theories on nationalism, Fong argued that although Hong Kong is not a sovereign state, it fits the definition of a nation by virtue of being a “political community” built on common civic values pursuing the “right to self-government”. While Fong’s hypothesis is interesting as an academic theory, its account of the emergence of Hong Kong’s autonomy movement is not based on Hong Kong’s true history. Its vision of Hong Kong as a “young stateless nation” based on common values, with its chance of success hingeing on China’s implosion and superpower intervention, is doomed to fail.

As someone who witnessed Hong Kong’s rise to prosperity, and was closely involved in the Sino-British negotiations on the future of Hong Kong, as well as preparations for Hong Kong’s transition into a special administrative region of China, I can speak from first-hand experience that there was little ambition for “self-government” on the part of the colonial government or the people of Hong Kong in the colonial era.

Advertisement
Two distinguished scholars, Ambrose King Yeo-chi of the Chinese University of Hong Kong and Steve Tsang of SOAS’ China Institute, documented in their studies how the British and Hong Kong governments rejected democratic self-rule as an option for Hong Kong people on two occasions – the first time in the late 1940s, after the British regained power after the Japanese occupation; the second time in the late 1960s, after the Hong Kong government did an in-depth review of the social, economic and political factors leading to the 1966 and 1967 riots.

In the colonial era, policymaking in Hong Kong was monopolised by British officials in Hong Kong, often in close consultation with London. Little was done to prepare local officials for leadership post-1997, let alone for “autonomy” as a “young stateless nation”, free of the supervision of its sovereign power.

One could blame Britain’s unwillingness to grant Hong Kong people democratic self-rule on China’s hard line on the city’s status. In 1972, soon after China joined the United Nations, it made crystal clear at that forum its rejection of Hong Kong’s status as a colony and any attendant right to self-determination.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x