Reform the WTO for a post-coronavirus world. The global economy needs a champion to lead it out of the crisis
- Collapsing trade must be rebuilt to spur recovery. The WTO can work on addressing trade restrictions on key supplies in the short term, and lead discussions to lower tariffs and facilitate e-commerce and agricultural trade in the long term
In 1941, at the height of World War II, Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt met secretly in a desolate bay off Newfoundland. Over the next four days, they thrashed out what would become one of the most important documents of the 20th century: the Atlantic Charter. It laid out principles for the post-war order, key among which were economic cooperation and a trading system open to all.
Even as war raged, there was good reason to worry about the role of trade in the peace that would follow. A decade before, the Great Depression had seen a vicious spiral of protectionism, economic hardship and nationalism wipe out two-thirds of world trade and sow the seeds of war. By contrast, after 1945, collective arrangements that grew out of the Atlantic Charter fed a virtuous cycle of openness, trade, prosperity and stability.
Scholars now see international trade as a key contrast between interwar instability and post-war recovery. Trade was also crucial after the 2008 financial crisis, enabling countries to feed off each other’s growth and offsetting fiscal and financial pressures.
History shows that trade can support recovery from the global calamity we are living through – it will help balance global supply and demand, and fuel long-term growth. The steps we take to limit or liberalise trade can profoundly affect our course out of the coronavirus crisis.
The Covid-19 pandemic has also increased calls to reshore production. Some governments may be tempted to raise tariffs to replace lost revenue. Such actions go against free trade.
Superpower drive to lure companies out of China post-virus gathers momentum
Without effective global mechanisms, recession can breed protectionism. Initially, trade began to recover after World War I. But dismal conditions triggered a wave of protectionism which the newly formed League of Nations was unable to stop.
By contrast, post-war institutions such as the 1947 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) helped to spur trade liberalisation and prevent backsliding in times of stress.
This underscores how trade-led recovery can be fragile and needs institutional support.
The WTO is the obvious solution. Like other global institutions, it has been weakened by years of deadlock and fallen behind the reality of global integration. But Covid-19 has created the need and will to reboot reform and haul the WTO into the 21st century.
In the short term, the WTO should address trade restrictions to ensure essential supplies can get to where they are needed. As Lamy pointed out, a certain degree of “precautionism” – legitimate safeguarding of citizen needs – is to be expected. But mechanisms are required to ensure this is done in a transparent and coordinated manner and doesn’t slide into more harmful forms of protectionism.
The WTO should launch sectoral negotiations to lower tariffs on pandemic-related goods such as medical supplies. We need to address non-tariff barriers and fully implement the Trade Facilitation Agreement to help overcome logistical bottlenecks exacerbated by the pandemic.
Broader reforms to support long-term recovery are also important. For example, completing the WTO’s e-commerce negotiations has become a priority as billions go online to shop, study, work or seek health care.
The importance of WTO reform is clear. The question is whether it is possible. The WTO secretariat can play a bigger role in driving change. Adjustments like forming a Covid-19 task force and using more flexible plurilateral agreements would also help.
Ultimately though, the WTO remains a membership-driven organisation. Real change requires that major powers play ball. This has proved challenging in recent years, but Covid-19 has widened the realms of political possibility.
We live in a different world to the one in 1941, one that is more multipolar and interconnected than ever. The fate of free trade will not be shaped by two men on a boat. But we do need to recapture some of the leadership, pragmatism and spirit of cooperation that forged post-war multilateralism. In particular, whether China and the US can work together is crucial.
Open trade is not a magic remedy to our economic woes. But it underpins many issues that will affect our post-pandemic world. If we can reinvigorate the WTO, it can be an institutional catalyst for recovery and cooperation. The contrasting experiences of the interwar and post-war eras show the stakes could hardly be higher.
Wang Huiyao is the founder of the Centre for China and Globalisation, a Beijing-based non-governmental think tank
Help us understand what you are interested in so that we can improve SCMP and provide a better experience for you. We would like to invite you to take this five-minute survey on how you engage with SCMP and the news.