Opinion | The US dream of South China Sea hegemony will only lead to conflict with Beijing
- The US has diverted the narrative from the real issues and hyped China’s installations in the area as a symbol of its aggression against rival claimants
- The situation will only get worse before it gets better and in the end the US will have to directly or indirectly share power with China

Is peace in the South China Sea possible? The answer depends in part on one’s definition of “peace”. If it means simply an absence of war, then the South China Sea is already at peace. It is an unstable and unpredictable peace, though, and therefore dangerous.
Many analysts, including me, have proposed long-term bargains and short-term stabilising measures, but neither China nor the United States has paid them any heed. The situation has further deteriorated with both parties increasing their military presence in the area, with a corresponding rise in the frequency of incidents.

03:23
The South China Sea dispute explained
A Council on Foreign Relations report says the US military “needs to continue conducting operations in the South China Sea to ensure its readiness in a number of contingencies, including the defence of Australia, Japan, the Philippines and Taiwan”. This is probably the real reason for the US military presence there – to maintain its regional hegemony. China believes the US wants to constrain its rightful rise and thereby continue its hegemony in the region.
