Invest in infrastructure to create connectivity, rather than pouring good money after bad, to save the global economy
- The hoped-for spending spree from cash handouts has not materialised but a major boost in infrastructure spending could pay dividends after stimulus runs out
- The China way, with institutions such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank providing a lead, could be a model
The money is available to finance a new approach but there are two main reasons it is not happening. One is an outdated but widespread belief that infrastructure spending simply creates “white elephants”, and the other is an equally invalid approach to private investment in infrastructure.
07:54
Six months after WHO declared Covid-19 a public health emergency, what more do we know now?
Attitudes towards financial stimulus are influenced more by short-term politics than by longer-term reasoning. It is natural to want to avoid a Covid-19-induced collapse in employment and a tsunami of corporate failures.
04:53
Jobless struggle to make ends meet in Hong Kong as city battles coronavirus and recession
Recent data suggests the reality is different. Even spendthrift US consumers have been using their cash handouts more to pay down credit card debt (and even to increase savings) than on a shopping spree.
How Covid-19 bailouts can secure a better future
Since a further post-Covid-19 economic shock is inevitable, it is surely better to begin implementing policies that at least hold out a reasonable chance of recovery, thus giving grounds for hope. This is where a major boost in infrastructure spending could pay dividends.
First, it is essential to abandon the idea that physical infrastructure is simply about building roads and bridges that create demand for steel and concrete (plus construction) but little else. Infrastructure creates “connectivity” which in turn means human interaction, trade, production and jobs.
01:52
Historic fishing community in Ghana demolished for new harbour project funded by China
The multiple and proven benefits of providing or renewing infrastructure are discussed in my recently published book, Foundations of the Future – the Global Battle for Infrastructure and they are much wider than is often supposed, in creating trade employment and other economic activity.
Using infrastructure as a major policy tool to prevent economic collapse and aid growth, however, cannot hope to succeed without very substantial financial contributions from the private and public sectors – and this is where leading capital markets fall short.
China’s belt and road deserves more credit amid Covid-19 pain
Companies and their shareholders are wary of infrastructure investment because of the perceived risks, and there are fiscal limits on how much governments can invest. Multilateral development banks have the ability to take on some of these risks – but not on the financial scale required.
Here again, the AIIB is taking a lead under its Sustainable Capital Markets Initiative which aims to tap capital markets in innovative ways and thus increase the bank’s powers as an intermediary to get private funds flowing into infrastructure. This is just one example of much-needed new thinking.
Anthony Rowley is a veteran journalist specialising in Asian economic and financial affairs