Inside Out | ‘Space philanthropy’ of Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk is less impressive than down-to-earth visions
- The Gates’ foundation has made huge headway on Earth in the battle against malaria and polio
- But what cost-benefit analysis persuades Jeff Bezos that US$1 billion a year on his space programme is a good way to spend his Amazon gains?

Philanthropic giving has a massive impact on governments and global policymaking. Whether for better or worse depends on your political view: if it flows to a cause you passionately support, then it is no doubt a gift to be welcomed. If it goes to a cause you despise, then it is an unacceptable assertion of influence at the whim of the elite.
Some forms of philanthropy are almost indisputably good. When the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation committed to malaria research, it doubled global funding at a stroke.
Its decision to do the same with polio, funding the vaccination of 2.5 billion children worldwide, has virtually eradicated the disease. Its support for Covid-19 vaccinations in developing countries will almost certainly have a massive impact on the global pandemic.

