Why the loss of confidence in China’s property market is set to persist
- Beijing has been more resolute in reining in the excesses in the property sector in the face of a sharp slowdown than markets anticipated
- Expectations of a dramatic reversal are unrealistic. Restrictions will be gradually eased, but the priority of taking the heat out of the market remains unchanged
Since last October, a growing number of leading investment banks and asset managers have turned bullish on Chinese stocks, enticed by cheap valuations and a belief that most of the bad news is already priced in. JPMorgan expects offshore Chinese shares to rise by as much as 32 per cent from current levels by the end of 2022.
The moves have reinforced a perception in markets that Beijing has decided its deleveraging campaign has reached its limits and the slowdown in the housing market must be reversed. Yet, while investor sentiment towards the property sector may have stabilised, confidence among homebuyers, developers, creditors and local governments continues to erode.
China’s debt-to-GDP ratio falls, but pace of deleveraging slows
In a sign of how much the fundamentals of China’s residential real estate market have deteriorated, nearly 30 per cent of the sector’s high-yield bonds – which account for the bulk of Asia’s sub-investment grade corporate debt market – were trading at distressed levels early last month, according to JPMorgan data.
This has set off a dangerous chain reaction of panic and uncertainty across the sector. Local governments, worried some projects will never be completed, are tightening monitoring of presale proceeds, making it more difficult for weaker developers to repay their debts and worsening the liquidity crunch.
In a report published last month, ratings agency Moody’s said China’s property industry was “caught in a negative credit loop”. This means the sector is suffering a crisis of confidence that threatens to become self-fulfilling if the government does not take more aggressive action to stabilise the market.
Many equity and corporate bond investors seem to believe a shift towards looser policy will become more apparent in the coming months. Yet, the level of conviction over the timing, scope and efficacy of a policy shift, even among the most bullish investors, is strikingly weak.
A far more likely scenario is that policymakers’ recent change of tone on the property market becomes more pronounced in the coming months. Restrictions on the sector will continue to be gradually eased, but the priority of taking the heat out of the market remains unchanged.
Doing the bare minimum to support the housing sector increases the risk of a policy mistake, and it makes it more likely that confidence in the industry will continue to deteriorate. While Beijing has the tools to avert a sharper downturn, its reluctance to use them more forcefully is an underappreciated risk in markets.
Nicholas Spiro is a partner at Lauressa Advisory