In two pandemic years, how political divisions and policy missteps have failed the world
- Since the first outbreak, the coronavirus pandemic has been marked by political failure in the US, the UK, Australia, Japan and China
- In Hong Kong, our leaders have been forced into a false choice of opening up to the mainland or the world. Harm to Hong Kong’s economy might be permanent
If our fate during the Covid-19 pandemic had rested in the hands of scientists and the medical profession, we would have been in good hands. Almost certainly the pandemic would by now be a fading – if painful – memory.
But here we are, two years after the outbreak, reporting 320 million Covid-19 cases worldwide, and five million deaths, with the Omicron variant energetically propelling a fifth viral wave. Communities worldwide are stressed, impatient, panicked and often in despair. Many have lost jobs, careers and income, and face economic hardship, with no prospect of early recovery.
The failure that has brought us to this point is not a failure of science or medicine. It is not due to an absence of knowledge of how to track or treat the virus. The failure is a failure of politics – both domestically and between countries.
The pandemic, unconcerned with political or national boundaries, has ruthlessly exploited political and social divisions. In particular, it has taken ruthless advantage of countries that call themselves democracies, exploiting their core principles of freedom of speech and personal privacy to seed dangerous division and hobble effective policymaking, and contorting legal systems ill-designed to adjudicate the right to personal freedom against the imperative of protecting human life.
Some leaders have brought embarrassment and controversy upon themselves – like the Scott Morrison government’s clumsy handling of an unvaccinated Djokovic, or Johnson, who imposed strict lockdowns on the British people and then brazenly broke those rules in the garden of 10 Downing Street.
Fifth wave highlights the flaws in Hong Kong’s pandemic policies
It is arguable that Lam’s administration here in Hong Kong has also fallen victim to toxic forces outside its control. Management of the pandemic has inevitably been caught up in the poisonous politics of the past three years. No sooner had the administration emerged bloodied from the community’s pro- and anti-mainland conflict, which underpinned street riots and unprecedented social disruption through the second half of 2019, than the pandemic was unleashed upon us.
The decision to pursue a draconian “zero-Covid” strategy seemed sensible, and even today must be credited with the remarkably limited suffering experienced by the local community.
But as the pandemic surged on, leaving Hong Kong and China among a tiny minority of economies willing or able to live with the austere consequences of being closed off from the rest of the world, so the decision to align with China (at the expense of Hong Kong’s historically vital role as an international business hub nestled between China and the global economy) has become entangled in the patriotic politics that coloured last November’s Legislative Council election.
Hong Kong will have no future as a business hub unless it opens up
The reality is that Hong Kong must be able to work seamlessly both into China and out into the global economy, or it cannot work in either direction. The present patriotic politics has forced a false choice on our political leaders of opening up to the mainland or the world. If this is not quickly resolved, harm to Hong Kong’s economy may be huge and permanent.
Politics aside, the scientific and medical guidance is clear and simple: share information on viral threats internationally and as fast as is possible; lock down until vaccines are available; vaccinate everyone; maintain effective social distancing (including mask wearing) at least until vaccine-based immunity takes hold; restore safe local and international travel by applying an agreed set of protocol.
There is an old Irish joke about a man being asked for directions. The man said, “I would not start from here.”
Once we acknowledge that the virus is permanently with us, we should get regularly vaccinated. We should also focus on international cooperation to make sure we learn well from the past two years.
We can count on our scientists and medical practitioners to do their part. But is there anywhere in the world where we can trust our politicians?
David Dodwell researches and writes about global, regional and Hong Kong challenges from a Hong Kong point of view