Why stock markets must stop acting like casinos, especially in Asia

With big wins for a few and not much for the rest, stock markets are attracting massive funds from the economy but meeting none of its real needs
These range from SME support and supply chain repair, to climate mitigation and infrastructure building

Anthony Rowley

Published: 10:15am, 4 Jul 2022

Why you can trust SCMP

Stock markets – as John Meynard Keynes, Warren Buffett and others have remarked – are like casinos. It is often a winner-takes-all game where a few become rich and powerful while others do not even get a seat at the table.

These “others” are often the legions of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) which, in contrast to the flashy tech titans and entrepreneurs of Wall Street, provide by far the largest share of employment, output and productivity in corporate Asia and beyond.

This is an indictment of so-called Anglo-Saxon capitalism, which has developed systems and structures capable of collecting huge savings beyond the purview of governments and banks, but not directing them efficiently into the broad base of business and industry.

Two recent events highlight the anomalies of this situation. One was a panel discussion that I moderated recently on the state of small enterprises in Asia. And the other was the publication of the “Corporate Finance in Asia and the Covid-19 Crisis” report by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

In the West, financial markets have become “tech-obsessed”, not only in the absurdly high valuations afforded to a few high-flying, high-profile and financially very powerful tech entrepreneurs (until very recently at least) but also in the cult of hi-tech start-ups.

Start-ups, as economic commentator and university professor Richard Katz said, are associated with “geeky” young entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley dreaming up new artificial intelligence or cryptocurrency innovations to be financed by venture capital companies.

01:51

Meta opens a physical retail store where customers take a first look at virtual reality

Venture capitalists queue up to pour money into these upstarts while stock market investors salivate over the prospect of buying shares in their initial public offerings before quickly selling on at a profit and moving to the next opportunity.

This is “market failure” on a huge scale because it rewards the privileged few with quick riches while the smaller firms forming the backbone of most economies are lucky to get a few crumbs. Markets need to change their perspective. Maybe a bear market will force such a change.

Katz, quoting OECD figures, noted that there are just 2,000 hi-tech firms in Silicon Valley when the United States is home to more than 50,000 high-growth enterprises. This compares to 16,000 in South Korea, 13,000 in the United Kingdom and 10,000 in France.

Despite their high-growth potential and performance, and their ability to create employment and trade, many of these companies are starved of working capital and investment funds because stock markets do not wish to know them, or investors lose interest after an (often premature) IPO.

Banks in many Asian countries, not least Japan, are not eager to lend to young, fast-growing companies – which Katz referred to during a Foreign Correspondents Club of Japan panel discussion as “gazelles” – without a guarantee. Instead, they favour slower-growing “elephants” or corporate dinosaurs.

Does it matter? Yes, from an economic growth perspective and especially as manufacturing supply chains have been ruptured in and beyond Asia by US-China and other geopolitical schisms, and cannot be repaired and restructured without heavy investment in SMEs.

04:43

HKEX considers opening offices in US and Europe to court global listings

It would appear that Asian companies are well served by stock markets. As the OECD observes, Asian listed companies represent over half of the world’s listed companies and one-third of global market capitalisation.

But this is misleading. Asian markets host some of the world’s largest companies and, last year, more than half the world’s 10,000 largest listed companies had their headquarters in Asia. In other words, stock markets are catering to elephants in Asia too.

Some may argue that evolution will take care of this, that markets will eventually expand to embrace more listings, of SMEs and large enterprises alike. But time is not on the side of evolution in this case.

Given the massive need for investment capital in Asia and other regions, not only to bolster the critical reinforcement of manufacturing supply chains and business services, but also to cater for climate change-related and infrastructure spending, new financing conduits will be needed.

Of course, there are already multilateral development banks which can leverage vast funds from a small equity base. But they are underused as financial “markets” largely because of ideological bias against state institutions.

As Suzanne Gaboury, director general of the Asian Development Bank’s private-sector operations department, observed in Tokyo, the bank is already providing funds to Asia’s SME sector and trying to make banks and policymakers aware of the big unmet capital needs in Asia, while promoting a digital business revolution.

More radical solutions are likely to be called for, however, in and beyond Asia as the financing gap exposed by “picky” stock markets and their boom-bust swings give way to calls for a more institutionally-led approach to collecting savings and directing them into real economic needs.

Anthony Rowley is a veteran journalist specialising in Asian economic and financial affairs