China’s property sector must downsize if there aren’t enough marriages to save it
- The decline in the number of marriages, the most significant driver of property demand, leaves China looking at a massive inventory that will take at least 10 years to digest
- Without downsizing and reforms, the property industry will become a zombie
The industry has enjoyed an incredible combination of huge volumes and high prices for so long partly due to the unique dynamics of China’s modern marriage market – men looking to marry were expected to own property, preferably debt-free.
The man’s parents and grandparents tended to pitch in, often exhausting their savings. The prospective bride’s family, free of financial pressure, would often push for purchase regardless of the price. Debt was sometimes used to plug the cash shortfall, borrowed under the names of the groom’s parents. Such demand has been a pillar of the property market.
The family name has also been a most powerful force for social order. No matter how hard life was, a man was motivated to try his best, find a woman and sire sons. For a wealthy man, this used to mean finding several women so as to have many sons – also a sure way of dissipating the wealth eventually.
The Chinese property market has been riding on this phenomenon for a decade and a half. But when even the grandparents have turned out their pockets, one simply cannot go further.
Marriage is the only significant driver of demand for property. With about 7 billion square metres in residential property under construction and unsold, if every marriage leads to a property purchase and the number of marriages doesn’t fall further, it would still take about 10 years to digest the inventory. Given that both assumptions are wildly optimistic, and that land banks, meanwhile, will only add to the inventory, it will be a long slog before the market returns to stability.
Yet neither the industry nor local governments seem willing to give up on the bubble. Land sales and property taxes have averaged close to 10 per cent of gross domestic product in recent years. The financing cost of mortgages and the construction of residential property is probably worth 7-8 per cent of GDP, and paid mostly to the state-owned financial system, with some leftovers for shadow banks. With so many mouths at the property trough, there must be many powerful interests lobbying the central government to revive it.
There will be many efforts in this direction, but none will have lasting impact. Most developers and small cities are simply not viable. The property industry is becoming a zombie. So are many local governments.
Urbanisation efforts, for example, should be concentrated on developing megacities. Most small cities are not viable in the long run anyway. Future generations will not want to live there.
Unfortunately, China is unlikely to restructure its economy. A consumption and megacity-led economy is not compatible with the political system. The economy is defaulting to an export-led model for now.
As long as the global economy remains standing, so will China. Only a total collapse of the global economy will trigger real reform in China.
Andy Xie is an independent economist