Advertisement
Advertisement
An employee inspects a wafer at the production line of a semiconductor chip company in Suqian, Jiangsu province, on February 28. Semiconductors have emerged as the latest front of competition between China and the United States, putting progress on globalisation and the underpinnings of global trade under unprecedented threat. Photo: Reuters
Opinion
Macroscope
by Anthony Rowley
Macroscope
by Anthony Rowley

Supply chains changing for good is why inflation is here to stay

  • So many distractions have taken attention from supply chains that the danger of the world’s vital economic organs collapsing has been concealed from view
  • In the absence of voices of reason, political leaders are being led by the nose into recession, possible economic depression or even outright conflict
“How can inflation be transitory if supply chain disruptions are here to stay?” read the headline of a column I wrote in August 2021. It was a fair question then, and it is even more relevant now as it becomes clear that the global economic order has changed for the worse, maybe for a long time.
Yes, China has reopened for business after a lengthy period of pandemic-induced lockdowns and analysts are now hailing that fact as a plus for the global economy. But it is a China whose growth prospects and economic links with the outside world have eroded.
Until quite recently, not many people knew what supply chains were. Like the arteries and veins of the body, these global goods and services networks command attention only when things go wrong. That is the case now, and they are suffering not from natural sclerosis but from conscious destruction.

So many distractions have diverted attention from the supply chain issue – notably the Covid-19 pandemic, US-China tensions, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and so on – that the very real danger of the world’s vital economic organs collapsing and ceasing to function has been concealed from view.

But continuing inflation is a symptom that should be warning us that all is not well with the global economic system. The malaise has gone from being acute to chronic – in the words of medical practitioners – meaning that it is not of a short-term nature but a long-term, perhaps even terminal one.

A crisis is rapidly approaching, brought about in part by the US refusal to accept China as an economic equal or to accept Russia’s position on Ukraine. This will end either in changes of attitude or in mutual destruction.

15:17

Russia invaded Ukraine 1 year ago. What has happened so far?

Russia invaded Ukraine 1 year ago. What has happened so far?

It might help to exert pressure on leaders if more people could understand what the gestures aimed at punishing China or Russia from a political standpoint are doing to erode the foundations on which economic globalisation has been built. Then, sanity might prevail.

We do not need to “look through” inflation, to use a phrase beloved of the transitory inflation lobby and of central bankers. Instead, we need to look directly at the causes of the continuing rise in goods and services prices that we are still seeing and which can only get much worse unless we reverse course.
The “transitory phenomenon” theory was never credible to anyone taking more than the most cursory look at the underlying causes of inflation. Sure enough, even as the prices of key commodities have softened, inflation in general fails to show a convincing decline.

For markets in 2023, much hinges on how quickly inflation recedes

Robbed of these usual suspects to blame for continuing inflation, many have shifted the blame to the alleged failure of central banks to foresee the consequences of extended periods of record low interest rates. It is either that or they try to lay it at the door of Russia’s war in Ukraine.

They avoid the fact that it is changes in the structure of the global economy that have set the world on a path of declining efficiency and productivity. Inflation thrives in such conditions.

China’s emergence upon the world trade scene as a supplier of manufactured exports was a key factor behind the “great moderation” in global inflation during recent decades. This is changing quite dramatically now, as global credit insurance provider Atradius has noted. “It is clear that [China-centred] global supply chains will remain exceptionally volatile for at least the next three years,” the firm suggested in a report last year.

01:51

Violence erupts at world’s largest iPhone factory over benefits and Covid-19 controls

Violence erupts at world’s largest iPhone factory over benefits and Covid-19 controls
The Covid-19 pandemic and geopolitical developments have prompted governments and companies worldwide to adjust their supply chains. This will entail a declining exchange of technology and knowledge. US restrictions on exports of hi-tech products to China will hinder the development of the Chinese technology sector.
Increasing geo-economic fragmentation is a growing risk for Asia in particular, as Atradius noted. Some countries will benefit from supply chain diversification, but “far-reaching geo-economic fragmentation owing to geopolitical considerations has potentially large economic losses”.

The failure to grasp the significance of these changes has created an inability to differentiate between short- and long-term threats to the global economy and between cyclical and structural phenomena. This explains the failure to grasp the underlying causes of inflation now.

Of course, all this does raise the question of whether central banks have also failed to fully understand the structural and trade pressures behind relentlessly rising prices. This in turn implies that a consequent plunge into economic recession or worse looks increasingly likely.

Trade did rise quite strongly in 2022 as a whole compared with 2021, but that was largely because of recovery from a post-pandemic plunge, And both goods and services trade fell quite sharply in the final quarter, “marking a gloomy end to a challenging year”, as the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development put it.

As I have said before, political leaders are being led by the nose by their foreign, defence and securities ministers into a blind alley of recession, possible economic depression or even outright conflict.

Those voices of reason from economic and trade ministers or from any other counsellors with the common sense to see beyond the ends of their noses – or those with an ounce of survival instinct, at least – appear to be going unheard. It is the most dangerous conspiracy of silence imaginable.

Anthony Rowley is a veteran journalist specialising in Asian economic and financial affairs

11