Advertisement
BN(O) passport
Opinion
Mike Rowse

Opinion | Worried about your MPF account? Blame the British for BN(O) confusion

  • Confusion among BN(O) passport holders is a direct result of the UK’s decisions about what constitutes British nationality and who is entitled to it
  • The undeniable truth is that the British government could solve the problem at a stroke by converting all the BN(O) cases to full British nationality

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
37
A protester holds a British National (Overseas) passport during a demonstration at Pacific Place in Admiralty on June 2, 2020. BN(O) passport holders abroad have raised concerns about being denied access to the funds in their Mandatory Provident Fund accounts in Hong Kong. Photo: Felix Wong

More than 30 years ago, two European countries with a history as colonial powers were planning their departure from Asia. A discussion of the different approaches they adopted would normally be of interest only to historians, but some of the decisions by one of them are still having serious consequences today.

For example, the recent discussions over the ability of British National (Overseas) passport holders to claim their Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) savings early is a direct result of the United Kingdom’s decisions across many years about what constitutes British nationality and who is entitled to it.

But before we delve too deeply into the British system, consider Portugal’s handling of Macau. It was easy to persuade Lisbon to cease administering Macau: the Portuguese government had already tried to hand it back to China without fuss. The preparatory discussions went smoothly, as did the formal handover in 1999.
Advertisement

Before leaving, as a mark of respect for their centuries in charge, Portugal offered a full Portuguese passport to Macau citizens who wanted one. This honourable gesture immediately produced some anomalies.

As citizens of a European Union member country, Macau citizens could go to live and work in the United Kingdom, and their children qualified for home student status and thus paid lower fees at British universities. Hong Kong “British” citizens, on the other hand, could not freely emigrate there, and their children had to pay the higher fees charged to foreign students.

Advertisement
The British approach was completely different. For most of the two years China and the UK spent negotiating Hong Kong’s return, Britain tried to retain a role in the city’s future governance. Only when Beijing made clear this was a complete non-starter did serious talks begin.
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x