Australia’s housing crisis and return of Chinese students a blessing and a curse for build-to-rent market
- The housing crisis has focused attention on purpose-built rental housing that is typically owned, managed and operated by institutional investors
- Australia’s market shows promise, but the sharp rise in construction costs and interest rates have cast doubt on the feasibility of new projects
Australia’s National Housing Finance and Investment Corporation (NHFIC) does not mince its words. In a report published last month, it said that “at a time of returning migration, [the housing market is] contending with a perfect storm of high inflation and interest rates, slowing supply and record low vacancy rates”.
More worryingly, the rental market has become increasingly unaffordable. The average rental increase in the capital cities last month reached 11.7 per cent year on year, an all-time high. The sharpest rises were in flats. In Sydney and Melbourne, rents soared 19.1 per cent and 15.2 per cent respectively, according to CoreLogic.
International students accounted for more than 40 per cent of tertiary enrolment before the pandemic. Many of these students rent flats in the capital cities, particularly Sydney and Melbourne, helping to drive up rents.
Unlike in the United States, where the multifamily sector is well established and has the highest share in commercial property transaction volumes, the Australian market is in its infancy. According to data from EY, there are just 23,175 units nationwide, more than half of them in Melbourne. However, less than 4,000 of them have been completed, with the rest in the planning phase or under construction.
More worryingly, eye-watering rent increases have thrown into question the affordability of BTR housing. Given that these developments are premium properties in highly desirable locations, targeted at renters with higher disposable incomes who are seeking superior amenities and a strong customer experience, they will do little to address the lack of affordable housing.
However, rents have soared partly because of the severity of supply shortages, underscoring the desperate need to boost housing starts. “Right now, BTR is a premium product because it has to stack up,” said Richard Temlett, director of research and strategy at Charter Keck Cramer in Melbourne. “Yet, any increase in supply will help put downward pressure on rents.”
The combination of a major repricing of site values, firm evidence that the BTR model works and has significant potential in other capital cities, plus the scope for big developers to scale up in a sector poised for growth, suggests that more institutional capital will be deployed in the coming years.
Hines, a large US real estate developer and investor, teamed up with the property arm of Canada’s Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan last November to develop and acquire up to US$1 billion of assets in Australia’s BTR sector. “Right now, there’s an opportunity to pick up attractive sites at once-in-a-lifetime prices,” said Ray Lawler, Asia-Pacific chief executive at Hines, adding that Australian BTR “could become one of the most significant things we do in the Asia-Pacific”.
For the time being, Australia needs to develop a critical mass of BTR projects if it hopes for the sector to become firmly established. The headwinds during the past year have made this more difficult, but boosting supply is key to addressing Australia’s housing crisis. The potential of the BTR market needs to be unleashed.
Nicholas Spiro is a partner at Lauressa Advisory