-
Advertisement
US-China relations
Opinion
Anthony Rowley

Macroscope | De-risking from China? That way lies economic disaster

  • Amid shifts in geopolitics, supply chains and global trade, companies have been scared into rethinking how they operate and invest
  • Government officials who are reshaping the world economy without a sound understanding of the consequences could well break the system

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
23
Heavy traffic is seen near a container depot in Monterrey, in Nuevo Leon, Mexico, on June 20. As US-China tensions rewire global trade, Mexico has overtaken China as the biggest supplier of goods to the giant customer next door. Photo: Bloomberg

Reshaping the world economy is a sound idea if it is done in pursuit of a sound global polity, improved efficiency, reduced inequality and a gain in the general good. But financial markets, along with production and trade systems, are about to find out what a bad design looks like.

A bad design is one drawn with political and strategic advantage in mind and which is willing to sacrifice economic well-being to that end. This is about where we are now as production systems prepare to adapt to ideological divisions and consequent logistical demands.

The global investment landscape will change, in line with shifting production and trade patterns, and money will need to be redirected accordingly. But to where? The answer is far from clear at this point.

Advertisement
For a time after then US president Donald Trump launched his tariff wars against China and others, it was possible to believe we would be able to return to the status quo ante once he left office and enjoy free trade and investment again, with all its benefits of low inflation and wider economic inclusion.
But things did not work out that way and Trump’s successor, Joe Biden, launched an arsenal of supposedly more sophisticated trade weapons including semiconductor export controls and targeted investment bans.
Advertisement

The supposed aim was to achieve “security” but it was really all about protectionism. What is clear now that these measures have scared the corporate world – multinationals especially – into a state of mind where they need to replan the architecture of business and industrial investment so they cannot be caught out by future shifts in political ideology.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x