Advertisement
China-Australia relations
EconomyChina Economy

Exclusive | Australian beef exporters banned by China are repeat offenders, but New Zealand firms escape sanctions, customs data shows

  • China banned four Australian meat processing plants last week, while also imposing a 80 per cent tariff on imports of Australian barley
  • The move raised suspicions that China was using technical requirements to punish Canberra for its call for an international inquiry over the origins of the coronavirus

Reading Time:5 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Beef for sale is seen at a Walmart in Beijing, China, September 23, 2019. Photo: Reuters
Su-Lin Tan

The four Australian meat processing plants banned from exporting to China had compliance issues dating back to 2017, although the same Chinese customs data showed two New Zealand processors were not punished for similar beaches of strict Chinese import regulations.

The conflicting outcomes reflect the complexity of the global food trade regulation as well as the pitfalls of diplomacy at a time when China finds itself facing repeated calls for an international inquiry into the origins of the coronavirus, including from Australia.

The Australian plants had repeated export compliance issues relating to more than 6,000kg of beef sent to Chinese ports last year, with problems starting since March 2019, mainland customs data showed. They had also been banned for four months in July 2017 for similar offences, namely mislabelling.

Advertisement

The most recent export records obtained by the South China Morning Post show the defective frozen and chilled beef products from the banned Australia plants – Kilcoy Pastoral, JBS Beef City, JBS Dinmore and Northern Cooperative Meat Company – were sent mainly to Shanghai, which is notoriously strict with import compliance, according to Chinese beef importers.

05:59

Coronavirus: What’s going to happen to China’s economy?

Coronavirus: What’s going to happen to China’s economy?

The errors – mislabelling, mismatched health and goods certificates, and the export of goods that had not yet met import protocols – occurred between March 2019 and February 2020.

Advertisement

Nearly 80 per cent of the violations were recorded at the port of Shanghai, while only a small portion of exports in the other commonly used ports, Tianjin, Dalian and Qingdao, did not comply with Chinese standards.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x