Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Are influencers over? Virtual KOLs offer brands a safe solution to win over China’s Gen Z – just ask Versace, Nike or Converse

Li Jiaqi’s, centre, is one of China’s top KOLs, but amid virtual competition from the likes of Ling 翎 (right), will he have a job for long? Photo Weibo/Jing Daily

The mass exodus of Chinese celebrities from international brands over Xinjiang cotton – produced using the forced labour of the Uygur minority, say China’s critics – has highlighted the issues facing brands seeking to refine their China influencer strategy. Brands can take micro-steps in this direction by opting for more flexible, politically aware and collaborative approaches.

Despite the market buzz and future potential of virtual key opinion leaders (KOLs), human influencers are still the most effective branding vehicle in luxury and fashion. Working with the right KOLs is how most luxury and fashion businesses began tapping into China’s affluent, young consumers. Now, adapting that strategy to fit with China’s Gen-Z and their patriotic consumerism and cancel culture has quickly become the new game.
Chinese YouTube celebrity Li Ziqi was awarded by Guinness World Records for having the most subscribers for a Chinese language channel. Photo: SCMP
Last month, a broad campaign targeted global fashion brands over their stances on human rights in China’s autonomous region of Xinjiang, sparking digital consumer riots. Within a week, at least 44 celebrities and countless social media KOLs terminated all types of collaborations with the brands in question, including Adidas, Nike, Converse and others.
This type of celebrity and influencer mass exodus is not new for China’s young and digitally empowered generation. After the Dolce & Gabbana “racist” rant scandal in 2018, an avalanche of outraged comments led to the cancellation of the brand’s Shanghai show and all its celebrity and model contracts. In 2019, a T-shirt that had listed Hong Kong and Macau as independent countries propelled a cohort of A-list brand ambassadors to cut off ties with Versace, Givenchy and Coach.

The recent dramatic influencer dropout in defence of using Xinjiang cotton is only part of a wider issue that would force brands to reconsider their China marketing strategies in an increasingly polarised world. Without a revisited plan, brands are likely to see even more complications and consumer boycotts soon.

Given the volatility of working with humans, predictable and perfectly disciplined “virtual KOLs” seem an easy alternative for brands. The Chinese CGI influencer Ling 翎 is a good case in point. “Born” in May 2020, Ling combines traditional Chinese beauty with contemporary streetwear style, and young netizens are loving her ancient-meets-modern look. Thus far, she has worked with well-known brands such as Tesla, Vogue and hip tea chain Nayuki.
Chinese CGI influencer Ling 翎. Photo: Jing Daily

Using virtual KOLs is an emerging trend for brands in China, said Arnold Ma, founder and CEO of the Chinese digital agency Qumin. “Ling, Luo Tianyi, KFC’s Colonel Sanders, Tmall’s Aimee, PokaPoka, and L’Oréal’s Mr Ou are all famous to Chinese Gen Zers,” he explained. “And although virtual Chinese KOLs have yet to reach their peak, brands could get on board because this industry has huge potential.”

Yet, this shift away from human to virtual KOLs is also attracting some scepticism, especially when it comes to concrete business results. Elisa Harca, co-founder of the retail consultancy Red Ant Asia, claims it is still too early to pinpoint the long-expected burst of the “influencer bubble”. “There was a lot of hype and buzz about virtual KOLs in the West and China pre-Covid-19,” she said. “But since then, the discussion has moved more toward live-streams with KOLs, KOCs (key opinion clients), or brand owners and employees, whereby anyone can become a voice of a brand.”

 

On Bilibili, a favourite platform with Gen-Z, the average top-level influencer has over 10 million followers. Yet, the average top-level virtual influencer has only about two million. Plus, with digital becoming the default mode of social interaction, there is greater value in a real human voice backing a brand. “In China, influencers and KOLs reign supreme, as they are still a highly effective way to reach communities. Influencers, with targeted advertising and in-platform SEO, are still the most effective marketing path for brands in the digital ecosystem,” she said.

Rather than jump into a virtual KOL-only approach or cut out KOL marketing altogether, taking micro-actions to improve the current influencer marketing model is a more feasible option for most brands. Here are four steps in that direction:

1. Choose short-term flexibility over long-term commitment

Red Ant Asia’s Elisa Harca suggests brands consider shorter-term deals versus long-term contracts to leave space for a pivot if needed. “In the past, many brands have opted for long-term collaborations in the view that it demonstrates commitment, loyalty and consistency,” she said. “However, with shifts taking place at China speed, it would be wise to break up those partnerships and collaborations so that not all your eggs are in one basket.”

 

2. Cultivate political sensitivity on China-related issues

Young Chinese consumer trust exists where the appetite for fashion and beauty meets fervent patriotism. To earn that trust, brands must cultivate practical political wisdom to avoid controversy. “Brands can either have a clear standpoint that supports China or avoid talking about politics on social media,” warned Qumin’s founder Arnold Ma. “Once Western brands get involved in political controversy, KOLs and celebrities will 100 per cent stop work with the brands because they need to save their reputation in the Chinese market, and they are patriotic and socially progressive.”

3. Use “creators” over “influencers”

The influencer archetype used to be someone with a big follower count who simply says nice things about the brand. But that scenario is problematic, business-wise. “Brands should move away from an overreliance on the traditional influencer model where they essentially borrow reach from KOLs,” explained Ma. “Every time they spend money on a KOL campaign, not only are they borrowing reach, but they are also paying money to help the KOLs grow their audience.”

A more sustainable alternative is to co-create with the KOLs by building brand-specific content together: a special collection, or something that remains the brand’s own asset.

 

4. Leverage the brand’s own digitalisation

The year 2020 stretched the idea of using digital to enhance luxury and fashion to its breaking point. From Prada’s post-runway designer talk format to Bottega Veneta’s “quit the social and join the magazine” reverse approach, numerous cases proved that, if used creatively, digital tools could enhance brand equity rather than diluting it.

During Covid-19, virtual consultations and founder meetups became increasingly popular ways for brands to engage with their audiences. In the beauty realm, KOEs (key opinion employees) also became more important during branded live-streams.

Across these examples, one pattern is consistent: KOLs or no KOLs, brands that experiment more digitally to convey authenticity are the ones winning over both press and consumers.

Want more stories like this? Sign up here. Follow STYLE on FacebookInstagramYouTube and Twitter.

This article originally appeared on Jing Daily.
Xinjiang
  • Adidas, Dolce & Gabbana, Givenchy and Coach are just a few of the big-name Western brands to have been caught up in boycotts in recent years
  • Virtual KOLs Ling, Luo Tianyi, KFC’s Colonel Sanders and L’Oréal’s Mr Ou are all well known to local Gen Zers – are human influencers a thing of the past?